Skip to content
Early access: Ray will answer from the knowledge each business publishes. Request access
ResolutionSample content

Resolving in the conversation: why a handoff is not the goal

A question handed off goes back to the team’s queue. What changes when the agent asks for what is missing, guides step by step and confirms the question was resolved.

[Author name][Role] at Convray

[date][n] min read

It is common to measure an automated chat by how many conversations never reach the team. That count mixes two different things: the question that closed because the customer got what they needed, and the one that closed because the customer stopped asking.

Ray starts from another goal: close the question in the same conversation, with the knowledge the business publishes, and pass it to a person only when it should. This article goes over what that will mean in practice.

Handing off is not resolving

A handoff does not finish the work: it moves it. The conversation goes to the inbox, someone picks it up from the start and the customer waits. That is why, with Ray, handing off to a person will be the exception and not the default.

Nor is it about holding on to the customer with vague replies. A reply will only count if it is backed by a published, current article, or by read-only account data. No source, no reply.

The three cases where a person will step in

The rule is short on purpose, so the team always knows why a conversation reached the inbox:

  1. 1A sensitive topic on the list. Personal data, legal claims, disputed payments, account closure, health or safety, and the topics each business adds.
  2. 2An explicit request from the customer. If the customer asks to talk to someone, the request will always be honored.
  3. 3A question with no source after clarifying it. If Ray asked for the missing detail and there is still no published information, it will say so and offer to pass the question to the team.

Outside those three cases, Ray will try to resolve.

What a resolving reply will look like

Resolving is not sending a link. The customer will get the written reply, with numbered steps and the exact names of menus and buttons, as they appear in the published article:

Illustrative example: the customer asks how to get a refund for a damaged product and Ray replies with the time limit and three numbered steps; below, the question of whether that resolved it.

Illustrative example with sample data. Lumora is a fictional brand.

What the customer will see: the written reply, with numbered steps and the site’s exact path, with no article cards or internal references.

The reply will not show the source to the customer. It will end with a simple question, “Did this answer the question?”, and the conversation will count as resolved only if the customer does not say the question is still open.

Clarify before handing off

Many questions arrive incomplete: “my order never arrived” does not say which order. Instead of passing the conversation to the team, Ray will ask for the missing detail and carry on.

What the team will see

The customer will get a clean reply; the team will see where it came from. In the console, each resolution will be recorded with the cited article, its version and the checks the reply passed. If a person joins the chat, they will see that same record.

What the team sees in the console

Illustrative example of the record in the console: the cited article and its version, checks and controls.

Illustrative example with sample data.

Measuring what gets resolved

If the goal is to resolve, so is the measure. Convray defines a resolution this way:

Resolution

A conversation Ray closed with an answer backed by the published knowledge, without a handoff to a person, and in which the customer did not indicate that the question was still open.

And it will charge only for those conversations: not for the ones Ray attempts, nor for the ones handed off to a person. The early access plans are on the pricing page.

Where to start

Three steps that prepare the ground before going live:

  • Review the most consulted articles and write them step by step, with the exact names of menus and buttons.
  • Define the business’s own sensitive topics, on top of the defaults.
  • Build the first test cases with real questions and what Ray is expected to do.

Sample content. This article illustrates the blog’s format. Author, role, date and reading time will be filled in on publication.

Written by[Author name][Role] at Convray. [Short author bio.]

See Ray with the business’s knowledge

A short conversation with the team that builds Ray to review the company’s case: frequent questions, existing knowledge, sensitive topics and a migration plan.

Related articles

See the blog
  • Resolution

    Ask for the missing detail before handing off

    An ambiguous question is no reason to pass the conversation to the team. How Ray will ask for a clarification and carry on with the question.

    [Author name][n] min read

  • Sensitive topics

    A short, explicit list of sensitive topics

    Why sensitive matters are best kept as a visible list, with a fixed base and each business’s own topics.

    [Author name][n] min read

  • Migration

    Migrating in stages, with a switch to go back

    Knowledge first, a parallel run next and a share of customers that will grow in stages, always with a way back to the previous chat.

    [Author name][n] min read